In a significant ruling, the Lahore High Court (LHC) dismissed a petition on Wednesday challenging the government’s decision to potentially close utility stores across Pakistan.
The court, while acknowledging the concerns raised, held that such decisions fall under the purview of government policy, making it inappropriate for judicial intervention.
Court Declares Closure of Utility Stores a Policy Matter
The petition was filed by an employee of the Utility Stores Corporation, who contested the government’s move to shut down these stores, fearing the potential loss of jobs.
The employee’s argument was rooted in concerns about the livelihood of thousands of workers, as well as the essential services these stores provide to the public.
However, Justice Raheel Kamran Sheikh of the Lahore High Court ruled that decisions regarding the closure of utility stores are policy matters, and such decisions cannot be interfered with by the judiciary.
The court suggested that if there are concerns over the potential closures, they should be raised in Parliament, which is the appropriate forum to address such matters.
The ruling reinforced the principle that certain government decisions, especially those involving public policy, should be handled by the legislative arm of the state.
Minister Clarifies: No Immediate Plans to Close Utility Stores
Just a day before the LHC ruling, on Tuesday, Minister for Industries and Production Rana Tanveer Hussain had reassured the public and concerned parties that there are no immediate plans to close or dissolve the Utility Stores Corporation.
His statement came during a session of the National Assembly, in response to a call attention notice raised by Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) member Asifa Bhutto Zardari.
Asifa Bhutto Zardari voiced concerns regarding the future of approximately 25,000 employees who work at utility stores, fearing that a closure would lead to mass unemployment.
Responding to this, Minister Hussain emphasized that the government is focusing on restructuring the Utility Stores Corporation rather than shutting it down.
He also assured that the employees’ rights would be safeguarded, allaying fears of large-scale layoffs.
Parliament as the Avenue for Resolution
The Lahore High Court’s ruling further emphasized the importance of addressing policy issues through the legislative process.
The court’s decision to redirect the issue to Parliament reflects the judiciary’s recognition of the separation of powers between the branches of government.
Utility stores have long served as an essential source of affordable goods for millions of Pakistanis, and any discussions surrounding their future are of significant public interest.
By advising that these concerns be raised in the National Assembly, the LHC reaffirmed the need for democratic deliberation and legislative debate in resolving such issues.
As restructuring discussions continue, stakeholders will likely keep a close watch on developments within Parliament.
For now, the government has made it clear that no closures are on the immediate horizon, and any changes to the Utility Stores Corporation will aim to preserve both the interests of the employees and the services they provide to the public.
